dead poets society

I saw this movie at a high school student. The newly-appointed English teacher who came to the noble family preparatory school for higher education of the whole dormitory system where this movie is rich in content in Vermont in 1959. Students make the lovers' society which says that the students who were being attracted were making the teacher who explains beauty of the poetry and wonderful of the life "meeting of the poet who can die" when he was a student formerly, restore by the hand through an unprecedented session. The landscape of the New England area from the early autumn which becomes a background of a drama to winter is also beautiful.This is a just story. It isn't such trivial thing that I aimed.The end is the case that one student who doesn't end and has that dies of a happy ending, and this talk ends. It's because why did my parents take his youth away too much too much when saying whether they died. I'll write that it can be learned from this movie.

First why do anyone as well as a parent intervene in others? Easy. It's because it's against to think one is right. By a movie, this, the place and his parents which offered that the student who committed suicide would like to participate in the musical at night for my parents," you're still a child.", and, they said somehow and opposed decisively.

When summarizing it, it's a paradox of parents' idea and child's idea. A child wanted to enjoy youth. On the other hand his parents seem to be a student and are serious and it's the idea that stay here.Now, I think the person who is hearing that a parent says seriously in school days and is studying is hardly here. Because it's because a child thinks the parents' way of thinking is wrong, too. It isn't possible to make them meet both opinions for a paradox to exist double here. The last thesis and antithesis.He'd like to play as expected as a child, too. That's ordinary. When not becoming more efficient at the place done seriously, it's insignificant. A child should also enjoy youth, and parents aren't supposed to take it away.

I'm certain that the author wanted one which is here simultaneously with importance of the youth. It's thorough argument, but isn't that importance of seeing a person objectively? This isn't that it was limited to my parents and a child. It's same even between the friends. Even though an idea is different, you don't have to intervene much. Because it's of no use because double paradoxes exist in the opinion described subjectively like an example above-mentioned.